EDITORIAL
CASO LABARRE UN FIASCO EN LA PROCURACION DE LA JUSTICIA
Debe investigarse la decisión de Tribunal Colegiado del XV Distrito al otorgar la liberación de Dave Arthur La Barre, quien al parecer ya no esta en México
En el asunto de deben configurar otros delitos, como el fraude equiparado y la defraudación fiscal.
Así mismo hay que hacer notar que La Barre no trabajaba solo, lo hacia con Andrew Thomas, como intermediarios de la empresa Terra Costa, S.A. de C.V.
POR SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
El caso Labarre, como prefiero referirme en este comentario, pone en evidencia clara el fraude especifico cometido contra varias personas, pero en lo particular nos llama la atención el asunto que agrava a Gregory Richard Acosta Valencia, no solo porque pago por adelantado una cantidad importante de dinero que suma un total de 560 mil dólares, mas otros gastos, dentro de un Fraccionamiento denominado ¨La Hacienda¨, cuyo propietario es el Lic. Armando Waldo González Baca, quien solo reconoce una operación con Andrew Thomas Fluss, de Terra Costa Inc., por el lote 1 de la manzana 23, y niega haber realizado contrato de compraventa con Dave Arhur La Barre y esta misma empresa Terra Costa, S.A. de C.V. quien según vendió el lote 7 de la manzana 27. En este asunto reconoce Armando Waldo González Baca que no le enbtrego el predio porque no se lo habian pagado,
El testimonio, sobre el asunto numero 76/2008, de Fanny Judith Parra Aispuro quien trabajo por tres años para Terra Costa, S.A. de C.V. en la administración para Dave Arthur La Barre y Andrew Thomas Fluss, quines se ostentaban como representantes de esta empresa que se dividio en dos secciones, por estrategia fiscal, es decir una empresa denominada Servicios Integrales de San Felipe, S.C. que manejaba los empleados y otra que se le denomino Operadora del Puerto de San Felipe, S.A. de C.V. y aun así siguió trabajando para Terra Costa S.A. de C.V., en este punto de la declaración de la empleada de estos dos norteamericanos, se exhibe el dolo para evadir al fisco federal mexicano, como lo marca los artículos 108 y 109 del Código Federal de la Federación por el delito de defraudación fiscal, asunto que debe conocer la Secretaria de Hacienda y Crédito Publico, pero así mismo el Agente del Ministerio Publico Federal, según se encuadra el delito en el articulo 400 BIS del Código Penal Federal, como delito grave, por evasión de impuestos, situación que se castiga con cárcel.
En la segunda parte de su declaración Fanny Judith Parra Aispuro reconoce que Gregory Acosta quien pagaba oportunamente y quien pago por adelantado ya que Dave Arthur La Barre le ofreció un descuento. Aun cuando Dave Arthur La Barre y Andrew Thomas Fluss sabían que no le habían entregado el lote en mención, ya que según explica en su declaración Fanny Judith Parra Aispuro que no le habían pagado al propietario original de los terrenos, es decir a Armando Waldo González Baca, en este punto cometieron el delito de fraude especifico en agravio de Gregory Acosta, y debe darse el delito de fraude equiparado, en agravio del Ayuntamiento de Mexicali, según lo exige el articulo 220 del Código Penal de Baja California, si analizamos que se están aceptando ventas de predios en fraccionamientos, que deben tener todos los permisos de uso de suelo, para fraccionar, como en el caso del Fraccionamiento “La Hacienda”, que debe exhibir la autorización correspondiente de la Dirección de Administración Urbana.
Tan solo con las pruebas documentales, de los agraviados, testigos y de Fanny Judith Parra Aispuro, obligaron al Lic. Francisco Avalos Hernández Juez Mixto de Primera Instancia con residencia en San Felipe, a dictar la orden de aprehensión de Dave Arthur La Barre, quien en su momento también debió hacerlo contra Andrew Thomas Fluss, y todavía puede hacerlo. En este asunto no me sorprende que el Juzgado III de Distrito le haya negado el amparo federal, lo que me nos pone a dudar que circunstancias y análisis de carácter jurídico se tomo en el mismo Tribunal Colegiado del XV Distrito en Mexicali, para revocar y ordenar si liberación, esto debe ser investigado por el Consejo de la Judicatura del Poder Judicial de la Federación, ya que las evidencia shechos y testimonios son claros y explícitos.
Es justo que en el caso La Barre, no solo Dave Arthur sea sentenciado por la justicia mexicana, sino además Andrew Thomas Fluss y quien mas haya y este defraudando, no solo a los inversionistas nacionales y extranjeros, sino al mismo fisco mexicano, y en su caso a la misma administración publica municipal de Mexicali, ya que deben investigar si todos los fraccionamientos turísticos están operando legalmente y pagando sus impuestos.
EDITORIAL
CASE LABARRE A FIASCO IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN MEXICO
• Must be investigated the Collegiate Court's of the District XV for granting the release of Arthur Dave La Barre, who apparently is no longer in Mexico
• In the case of other crimes must be set, such as fraud and tax fraud equated.
• It must be noted that the Arthut La Barre, wasn´t working alone, he had a parthner in Andrew Thomas, as an enterprise Terra Costa, SA of C.V.
BY SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
The case Labarre, as I prefer to named it in this comment, shows clearly the specific fraud committed against several persons, but in particular we call the attention to the case denounce by Gregory Richard Acosta Valencia, not only because he pay a significant amount in advance money for a total of 560 thousand dollars, plus expenses, in a land subdivision called ¨ La Hacienda, owned by Mr. Waldo Armando González Baca, who only recognizes a transaction with Thomas Andrew Fluss, of Terra Costa Inc . for the lot 1 block 23, and denies having made the contract of sale with Arhur Dave La Barre and the same company Terra Costa, SA of C.V. who sold as Lot 7 of Block 27. In this case recognizes Waldo Armando González Baca he did not gave the lot, because they not paid pay him.
The testimony of Fanny Parra Judith Aispuro, in the case 76/2008, who worked for three years for Terra Costa, SA of C.V. in the administration for Dave Arthur La Barre and Andrew Thomas Fluss, they claimed to be representatives of this company, ho was divided into two sections, on a fiscal strategy, first in a company called Servicios Integrales de San Felipe, SC who handled the employees it and another called Operadora of the Port of San Felipe, SA of C.V. and still continued working for Terra Costa SA Ltd., at this point of her statement shows how this two Americans, their displayed to evade pay federal taxes, against wath the Articles 108 and 109 of the Federal Code of the Federation defines for the crime of tax fraud, case that hs to be aware to the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit –ShyCP-, but also the agent of the Federal Public Ministry (Federal District Attorney), as fits the crime in Article 400 bis of the Federal Penal Code, a felony, for tax evasion, which is punishable by prison.
In her second statement Fanny Parra Aispuro recognizes that Gregory Acosta timely paid and who paid in advance as Arthur Dave La Barre offered a discount. Even La Barre and Dave Arthur Andrew Fluss, knew they were defrauding their client, as it says in its statement Fanny Parra Judith Aispuro, they had not paid the original owner of the land, Waldo Armando Gonzalez Baca, at this point of her statement they commited specific fraud in grievance of Gregory Acosta, and must be matched with the crime of fraud to the Municipality of Mexicali as is required by Article 220 of the Criminal Code of Baja California, is looking are accepting sales of properties in subdivisions, which should have all the permits of land use, to split, as in the case of Fraccionamiento "La Hacienda", which should exhibit the authorization of the Directorate of Urban Management, for the Mexicali County.
Only with the documentary evidence of the fraud victims, witnesses and Fanny Parra Judith Aispuro statement forced Francisco Avalos Hernández Joint Judge of First Instance based in San Felipe, to issue the arrest warrant against Arthur Dave La Barre, who at the time also had to do the same against Andrew Thomas Fluss, and still can.
In this case I am not surprised that the District III Court had denied federal protection, which makes me doubt is the circumstances and legal analysis taken in the College XV District Court in Mexicali, to revoke judicial order to arrest Arthur La Barre and released him, this should be investigated by the Judicial Council of the Poder Judicial de la Federacion , as the evidence and testimonies in this case are clear and explicit.
It's just that in this case not also Dave Arthur La Barre has to be sentenced and put in jail bay the Mexican justice but also his partner Andrew Thomas Fluss, and wath ever has been defrauding the domestic and foreign investors, but also evading to pay taxes to the Mexican authorities, and in this case to the municipal government and Mexicali, as they have to investigate whether all tourist subdivisions are operating legally and evading to pay taxes.
viernes, 6 de febrero de 2009
lunes, 2 de febrero de 2009
DENUNCia VENTA DISFRAZADA DE LOTES EN LOS OLIVOS, EN LA INASION DEL RIO TECATE
TECATE.-Con una sola nota se puede afirmar todo, el pronlema de los invasores del Rio, no solo los que ocupan la zona federal sino la propiedad privada, son objeto constante de personas que se aprovechan de su buena fe y necesidad, en el caso de la Colonia Los Olivos, ya han ppasado 5 messas directivas, y siempre ha sido lo mismo, las familias tienen que seguir cooperando, y en los casos mas dificles pagar por la posesion, de manera disfrazada o abierta, depende del "lider", el asunto que aqui se denuncia fue fortuito.
POr esta misma razon no quieren que vayan los peirodistas, para que no sigamos publicando la verdad, que si bien es cierto hay gente que se aprovecha d ela invasion para especular con los predios, otras familias y en lo particular mujeres solas con sus hijos se arriesgan para poder tene run lugar para vivir, apenas les alcanza para poder comer y transportarse a su trabajo, un gran ejemplo, por eso molesta la voracidad de personas que se aprovechan de su situacion.
Por esta sola razon deben intervenor las autoridades, para darles apoyo a las familias necesitadas y en segundo detener a estos lideres que cometen fraude y comercian con lo que nos les pertenece.
domingo, 1 de febrero de 2009
EDITORIAL
EDITORIAL
EN PELIGRO LA INVERSION DE EXTRANJEROS EN MEXICO
• Debe investigar la Secretaria de Gobernación, Relaciones Exteriores y la Secretaria de Hacienda Y Credito Publico en el Caso Dave La Barre
• Aun Comprobados los ilícitos libra la acción de la justicia por decisión de un magistrado
• Inseguridad de la inversión en los fraccionamientos turísticos, pone en peligro la inversión extranjera
POR SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
No es la primera ocasión que se denuncian fraudes en agravio de extranjeros, como lo hizo ya Gregory Acosta en contra de conciudadano Dave La Barre, quien se ostenta como Presidente de Un consejo de administración de 5 empresas, que si bien es cierto esto puede ser cierto, pero la certeza se pone en duda, cuando con recibos en la mano se le cuentan ya tres denuncias penales, una de ellas ya origino la orden de aprehensión en el caso de Arthur La Barre, quien acaba de recibir la benevolencia y el acuerdo de revocación del Colegiado XV de Distrito con residencia en Mexicali, debe salir libre, esto pone en evidencia la actuación del Agente del Ministerio Publico del Fuero Común y del Juzgado Mixto de Primera Instancia, ambos con residencia en el Puerto de San Felipe, del mismo Juez III de Distrito quien negó el amparo, y que pierde en revisión
En este asunto tres funcionarios de distintos niveles vieron en las pruebas documentales y testimoniales la presunta culpabilidad que dio origen a la orden de aprehensión de Dave Arthur La Barre, y solo uno vio el asunto de manera diferente, después de un proceso de 9 meses, se pone en evidencia a la justicia en México, pero mas aun las inversiones que se vienen dando de parte de extranjeros, quien han puesto sus ojos en México, en este momento donde la crisis económica agrava el mundo, los Estados Unidos y muy en particular a nuestro país.
En lo particular no se puede asegurar que todos los fraccionamientos turísticos, y otras inversiones que pone en el mapa al Puerto de San Felipe, como el “Boom Económico” en la región, lo que promete ser una zona turística que bien en el futuro puede competir con Can Cun, están mal, por eso debe investigarse por bien de todos.
Pero que ha sucedido en Baja California, se han dado casos lamentables donde inversionistas norteamericanos se han visto defraudados como el Caso de Punta Colonet, ahora el asunto que pone en jaque al menciona Fraccionamiento “La Hacienda” en San Felipe,.
Aquí solo como mexicanos que queremos a nuestro país, en pleno estado de derecho, de la legalidad y garantías que el mismo Presidente de la República Felipe Calderón a impulsado, es justo que en respuesta al Derecho Internacional, que se sustenta en Tratados entre ambos países en este particular asunto, compromete la intervención de la Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores, la Secretaria de Gobernación, y la misma Secretaria de Hacienda y Crédito Publico, ya que la venta en lo particular de un predio de 132 metros cuadrados en 460 mil dólares, nos evidencia si se pagaron impuestos o se están pagando los gravámenes, lo que daría origen a otro asunto de un posible delito fiscal por evasión de impuestos.
Mientras la fama de no invertir en México, ya no se da por la acción punitiva de los integrantes del crimen organizado que en pleno reto a la autoridad han tomando las calles como campo de batalla, ahora la mala imagen esta en la falta de garantías en la inversión en nuestro país para evitar este tipo de denuncias y hechos de fraude contra extranjeros.
En la lucha contra la corrupción, el Presidente de la República y sus Secretarios han reconocido que existe altos índices de corrupción en el Poder Judicial en México, y esto pone en evidencia al Congreso de la Unión ante la falta de leyes mas explicitas y determinantes que permiten esta situación.
EDITORIAL
IN DANGER THE FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN MEXICO
• It should be investigated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Finance in the case Dave La Barre
• Even when the illicit were proven he´s liberated bay a magistrate.
• Insecurity on land sales investment in tourism threatens foreign investment
BY SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
This is not the first occasion that allege fraud were foreigners are victims, as an example the case of Gregory Acosta against hes fellow citizen Dave La Barre, who claim to be chairman of a board of 5 companies, which although it may be true, but the certainty is put in doubt when with receipts in hand, Arthut La Barre was already envolved in three criminal complaints, one of them led to the arrest warrant in the case of Arthur La Barre, who had just received the goodwill and the agreement revocation of the College District XV with residence in Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico, should come free, puts in doubt the performance of the Public Ministry agent – District Attorney- and the Mixed Court of First Instance, both with residency in the Port of San Felipe, and the III district judge .Federal Judge- who denied bail and who loses in the review of this case.
In this case three different levels of officials saw in the documentary and testimonial evidence that the alleged guilt led to the arrest warrant for Arthur Dave La Barre, and only one saw the issue differently, after a process of 9 months, is clear that justice in Mexico is in doubt, but most investments have been evolving from foreigners, who have set their eyes on Mexico, at the moment where the world economic crisis worsens, in the United States and particularly to our country.
In particular it can not ensure that all land sales era illegal, bot to insure investments in tourism and other investments that in the map the Puerto de San Felipe, as the "economic boom" in the region, which promises to be a tourist area in the future that may well compete with Can Cun, there has to be an investigation for the good of everybody.
But what has happened in Baja California, there have been unfortunate cases where U.S. investors have been disappointed as the case of Punta Colonet, now puts the question in check lans sale in "La Hacienda" in San Felipe.
As Mexicans we want justice, right in the rule of law, legality and guarantees, that even the President of Mexico Felipe Calderón claims, who is just to response to international law, which is based on treaties between the two countries this particular case, compromises the action of the Foreign Affaris Secretary, the Secretary of the Interior and the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, since the sale in a particular area of 132 square meters in 460 thousand dollars, it evidence if taxes were paid or if they are paying taxes, this case is giving rise to another issue of possible criminal tax evasion.
While the reputation of not investing in Mexico because there is no punitive action by members of organized crime in the challenge to the authority have taken to the streets as a battleground, now the bad image that the lack of guarantees investment in our country to prevent such acts and allegations of fraud against foreigners.
In the fight against corruption, the President and his secretaries have recognized that there is high corruption in the Judicial Area in Mexico, and this cases demonstrates thar the Congress of the Union, lacks in the absence of explicit laws that allow this kind of frauds.
EN PELIGRO LA INVERSION DE EXTRANJEROS EN MEXICO
• Debe investigar la Secretaria de Gobernación, Relaciones Exteriores y la Secretaria de Hacienda Y Credito Publico en el Caso Dave La Barre
• Aun Comprobados los ilícitos libra la acción de la justicia por decisión de un magistrado
• Inseguridad de la inversión en los fraccionamientos turísticos, pone en peligro la inversión extranjera
POR SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
No es la primera ocasión que se denuncian fraudes en agravio de extranjeros, como lo hizo ya Gregory Acosta en contra de conciudadano Dave La Barre, quien se ostenta como Presidente de Un consejo de administración de 5 empresas, que si bien es cierto esto puede ser cierto, pero la certeza se pone en duda, cuando con recibos en la mano se le cuentan ya tres denuncias penales, una de ellas ya origino la orden de aprehensión en el caso de Arthur La Barre, quien acaba de recibir la benevolencia y el acuerdo de revocación del Colegiado XV de Distrito con residencia en Mexicali, debe salir libre, esto pone en evidencia la actuación del Agente del Ministerio Publico del Fuero Común y del Juzgado Mixto de Primera Instancia, ambos con residencia en el Puerto de San Felipe, del mismo Juez III de Distrito quien negó el amparo, y que pierde en revisión
En este asunto tres funcionarios de distintos niveles vieron en las pruebas documentales y testimoniales la presunta culpabilidad que dio origen a la orden de aprehensión de Dave Arthur La Barre, y solo uno vio el asunto de manera diferente, después de un proceso de 9 meses, se pone en evidencia a la justicia en México, pero mas aun las inversiones que se vienen dando de parte de extranjeros, quien han puesto sus ojos en México, en este momento donde la crisis económica agrava el mundo, los Estados Unidos y muy en particular a nuestro país.
En lo particular no se puede asegurar que todos los fraccionamientos turísticos, y otras inversiones que pone en el mapa al Puerto de San Felipe, como el “Boom Económico” en la región, lo que promete ser una zona turística que bien en el futuro puede competir con Can Cun, están mal, por eso debe investigarse por bien de todos.
Pero que ha sucedido en Baja California, se han dado casos lamentables donde inversionistas norteamericanos se han visto defraudados como el Caso de Punta Colonet, ahora el asunto que pone en jaque al menciona Fraccionamiento “La Hacienda” en San Felipe,.
Aquí solo como mexicanos que queremos a nuestro país, en pleno estado de derecho, de la legalidad y garantías que el mismo Presidente de la República Felipe Calderón a impulsado, es justo que en respuesta al Derecho Internacional, que se sustenta en Tratados entre ambos países en este particular asunto, compromete la intervención de la Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores, la Secretaria de Gobernación, y la misma Secretaria de Hacienda y Crédito Publico, ya que la venta en lo particular de un predio de 132 metros cuadrados en 460 mil dólares, nos evidencia si se pagaron impuestos o se están pagando los gravámenes, lo que daría origen a otro asunto de un posible delito fiscal por evasión de impuestos.
Mientras la fama de no invertir en México, ya no se da por la acción punitiva de los integrantes del crimen organizado que en pleno reto a la autoridad han tomando las calles como campo de batalla, ahora la mala imagen esta en la falta de garantías en la inversión en nuestro país para evitar este tipo de denuncias y hechos de fraude contra extranjeros.
En la lucha contra la corrupción, el Presidente de la República y sus Secretarios han reconocido que existe altos índices de corrupción en el Poder Judicial en México, y esto pone en evidencia al Congreso de la Unión ante la falta de leyes mas explicitas y determinantes que permiten esta situación.
EDITORIAL
IN DANGER THE FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN MEXICO
• It should be investigated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Finance in the case Dave La Barre
• Even when the illicit were proven he´s liberated bay a magistrate.
• Insecurity on land sales investment in tourism threatens foreign investment
BY SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
This is not the first occasion that allege fraud were foreigners are victims, as an example the case of Gregory Acosta against hes fellow citizen Dave La Barre, who claim to be chairman of a board of 5 companies, which although it may be true, but the certainty is put in doubt when with receipts in hand, Arthut La Barre was already envolved in three criminal complaints, one of them led to the arrest warrant in the case of Arthur La Barre, who had just received the goodwill and the agreement revocation of the College District XV with residence in Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico, should come free, puts in doubt the performance of the Public Ministry agent – District Attorney- and the Mixed Court of First Instance, both with residency in the Port of San Felipe, and the III district judge .Federal Judge- who denied bail and who loses in the review of this case.
In this case three different levels of officials saw in the documentary and testimonial evidence that the alleged guilt led to the arrest warrant for Arthur Dave La Barre, and only one saw the issue differently, after a process of 9 months, is clear that justice in Mexico is in doubt, but most investments have been evolving from foreigners, who have set their eyes on Mexico, at the moment where the world economic crisis worsens, in the United States and particularly to our country.
In particular it can not ensure that all land sales era illegal, bot to insure investments in tourism and other investments that in the map the Puerto de San Felipe, as the "economic boom" in the region, which promises to be a tourist area in the future that may well compete with Can Cun, there has to be an investigation for the good of everybody.
But what has happened in Baja California, there have been unfortunate cases where U.S. investors have been disappointed as the case of Punta Colonet, now puts the question in check lans sale in "La Hacienda" in San Felipe.
As Mexicans we want justice, right in the rule of law, legality and guarantees, that even the President of Mexico Felipe Calderón claims, who is just to response to international law, which is based on treaties between the two countries this particular case, compromises the action of the Foreign Affaris Secretary, the Secretary of the Interior and the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, since the sale in a particular area of 132 square meters in 460 thousand dollars, it evidence if taxes were paid or if they are paying taxes, this case is giving rise to another issue of possible criminal tax evasion.
While the reputation of not investing in Mexico because there is no punitive action by members of organized crime in the challenge to the authority have taken to the streets as a battleground, now the bad image that the lack of guarantees investment in our country to prevent such acts and allegations of fraud against foreigners.
In the fight against corruption, the President and his secretaries have recognized that there is high corruption in the Judicial Area in Mexico, and this cases demonstrates thar the Congress of the Union, lacks in the absence of explicit laws that allow this kind of frauds.
PREFERS NOT TO INVEST IN MEXICO, DUE TO THE LACK OF GUARANTEES
PREFERS NOT TO INVEST IN MEXICO, DUE TO THE LACK OF GUARANTEES
`Gregory Acosta Valencia invested 760 thousand dollars in a Propiety in San Felipe Mexico
`Dave Arthur La Barre finally comes free from decision of the Court of Collegiate XV District. For whom was found guilty on charges of specified fraud by the Board of First Instance Court of San Felipe.
BY SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
MEXICALI, B.C. .- Attracted by the offer of investments in land and subdivisions that are being offered in the Port of San Felipe, encourage Gregory Acosta Valencia and his wife Susan to make an investment of 760 thousand dollars in "La Hacienda", confident that the company Terra Cota, SA of C.V. represented by the American Dave Arthur Labarre, assure them that it was serious and honest company, as there was no problem because he had bought from a lawyer name Waldo Gonzalez Vaca, and he has the property titles.
But the time pass by and they do not receive the propiety, and much less it was not returned the money that he invested, so they decided to make a criminal complaint against Arthur Labarre Dave and whoever is responsible to the District Attorney Agency resident in the Port of San Felipe, who send the case to the Joint Judge of First Instance, with residency in this Baja Port, which turn the arrest warrant against Arhur Dave La Barre. on June 3, 2008 motion under 576/08, to be supplemented by agents Ministerial La Barre was arrested and taken to Mexicali State Jail.
Situation that gave him confidence that the Mexican justice was taking his complaint serious and justice was going to be done, even do when he became aware through his lawyer that he had been denied the bail from the III District Federal Court, certainly base on the clear evidence, documents and witnesses that support the original complaint.
However, after after 9 months wasted on expenses and promotions, his disappointment and helplessness became on the decision of helplessness before the ruling to revoke Dave or David Arthur David La Barre imprisonment, who was referred to the criminal case 76 / 2008 on charges of specific fraud that was dictated by the Judge of the Joint Court of First Instance of San Felipe, with a term of 24 hours in order to certify the judicial order, dictated by the XV College District Court in Mexicali, as it was reported to his attorney, said Gregory Acosta.
From this bitter experience, and his ignorance of Mexican law and even more from the lack of securities to be offered the tour land sellers in Mexico in the future he prefers not to invest in this country, because there is no protection, like in his case for foreign investors.
How ridiculous is that the investment was pre pay for 132 square meters in a luxury zone, and a promise for exclusive beach for the amount of 460 thousand dollars in cash, plus additional costs for another 300 thousand dollars, in what was supposed to be his place of rest and vacation.
Gregory Acosta emphasizes that the Mexican authorities must investigate more thoroughly about the authenticity of the Fraccionamientos, subdivisions that sell lots and houses in the Port of San Felipe and Baja California, because has been proven that other Americans have been defrauded.
`Gregory Acosta Valencia invested 760 thousand dollars in a Propiety in San Felipe Mexico
`Dave Arthur La Barre finally comes free from decision of the Court of Collegiate XV District. For whom was found guilty on charges of specified fraud by the Board of First Instance Court of San Felipe.
BY SALVADOR AGUIAR LABRADA
MEXICALI, B.C. .- Attracted by the offer of investments in land and subdivisions that are being offered in the Port of San Felipe, encourage Gregory Acosta Valencia and his wife Susan to make an investment of 760 thousand dollars in "La Hacienda", confident that the company Terra Cota, SA of C.V. represented by the American Dave Arthur Labarre, assure them that it was serious and honest company, as there was no problem because he had bought from a lawyer name Waldo Gonzalez Vaca, and he has the property titles.
But the time pass by and they do not receive the propiety, and much less it was not returned the money that he invested, so they decided to make a criminal complaint against Arthur Labarre Dave and whoever is responsible to the District Attorney Agency resident in the Port of San Felipe, who send the case to the Joint Judge of First Instance, with residency in this Baja Port, which turn the arrest warrant against Arhur Dave La Barre. on June 3, 2008 motion under 576/08, to be supplemented by agents Ministerial La Barre was arrested and taken to Mexicali State Jail.
Situation that gave him confidence that the Mexican justice was taking his complaint serious and justice was going to be done, even do when he became aware through his lawyer that he had been denied the bail from the III District Federal Court, certainly base on the clear evidence, documents and witnesses that support the original complaint.
However, after after 9 months wasted on expenses and promotions, his disappointment and helplessness became on the decision of helplessness before the ruling to revoke Dave or David Arthur David La Barre imprisonment, who was referred to the criminal case 76 / 2008 on charges of specific fraud that was dictated by the Judge of the Joint Court of First Instance of San Felipe, with a term of 24 hours in order to certify the judicial order, dictated by the XV College District Court in Mexicali, as it was reported to his attorney, said Gregory Acosta.
From this bitter experience, and his ignorance of Mexican law and even more from the lack of securities to be offered the tour land sellers in Mexico in the future he prefers not to invest in this country, because there is no protection, like in his case for foreign investors.
How ridiculous is that the investment was pre pay for 132 square meters in a luxury zone, and a promise for exclusive beach for the amount of 460 thousand dollars in cash, plus additional costs for another 300 thousand dollars, in what was supposed to be his place of rest and vacation.
Gregory Acosta emphasizes that the Mexican authorities must investigate more thoroughly about the authenticity of the Fraccionamientos, subdivisions that sell lots and houses in the Port of San Felipe and Baja California, because has been proven that other Americans have been defrauded.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)